The Spoiler Zone: Ant-Man

The Spoiler Zone: Ant-Man

Abandon all hope ye who enter here, you will get spoiled.

We at Film Police Reviews are introducing a new section to our site. Welcome to the (drum roll please) SPOILER ZONE!

This is the place where you, our dear readers, can start debating, discussing, arguing, about movies without the threat of spoiling anything for people who haven’t seen it yet. So feel free to dissect key points, raise theories, and bring up plot holes. We’re giving you free reign, baby.

To inaugurate this sections, let’s talk about Marvel’s last entry to its Phase 2 slate of movies, Ant-Man. (Check out our review here.)

Chiropractic is an all-natural healthcare practice, which focuses on hands-on techniques, cheap sildenafil uk natural therapies, proper diet and nutrition, and the overall health and biomechanics of the body as a whole, whether applied to a canine or a person. But, the online cialis pills is cheap and now it is popular and almost every man who is suffering about his small penis or weak erection know about it. Oral jelly kamagra is a simple solution to symptoms, and viagra discount is often as effective as the branded medicine. Consequently slowing http://robertrobb.com/covid-19-credit-grabbing-and-blame-shifting-in-congress/ buy sildenafil uk down the spontaneous processes of your body. Once you enter the comments section, assume that everyone there has already seen the movie. If you haven’t and you still want to browse through the comments, remember us whispering gently into your ear…”we told you so.”

So, go ahead, make our day, spoil the night away.

 

 

3 thoughts on “The Spoiler Zone: Ant-Man

  1. I know everyone will probably be disappointed with how I am opening this “spoiler-filled” discussion. This doesn’t even constitute as a spoiler. I don’t know, but it takes away hours from my sleep thinking about what creative indifference Edgar Wright and Marvel might have had to part ways like that midway through the production.

    (My bet is Disney, but I’m switching off my cynic buttons.)

    Don’t get me wrong: I’m not complaining about having Peyton Reed on-board, director of Yes Man (which I consider a classic). It gets me thinking about what touches Wright, director of Shaun of the Dead (which is no-brainer a classic; excuse the merciless pun), might have left in the final cut.

    I don’t want to draw superlatives, but maybe I do. >:)

  2. I heard that Edgar Wright wanted it to be completely standalone. No reference to the Marvel Cinematic Universe whatsoever. Tapos Kevin Feige found his draft “too british,”

    I think the “what could have been” will always be a looming factor when it comes to this movie. Not dissing Peyton Reed, but we all know Edgar Wright is a master of visual comedy. His approach would have been more stylish and ideally more creative. I think some of his trademarks still made its way to the final product. Yun fast cuts pa lang eh. Hay what could have been.

    Didn’t like the drama of the movie though. Felt too much. I think the movie’s self-aware though. They always had Paul Rudd abruptly breaking the tension. lol

  3. I heard that Edgar Wright wanted it to be completely standalone. No reference to the Marvel Cinematic Universe whatsoever. Tapos Kevin Feige found his draft “too british.”

    I think the “what could have been” will always be a looming factor when it comes to this movie. Not dissing Peyton Reed, but we all know Edgar Wright is a master of visual comedy. His approach would have been more stylish and ideally more creative. I think some of his trademarks still made its way to the final product though. Yun fast cuts pa lang eh. Hay, what could have been.

    Didn’t like the drama of the movie though. Felt a little too forced. I think the movie’s self-aware though. They always had Paul Rudd abruptly breaking the tension. lol

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Film Police Reviews

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading