The Woolworth family is composed of three Filipino siblings, the titular Edsa Woolworth, played by Pokwang who is not terrible in drama for someone well-versed in self-deprecating stand-up comedy; Boni, enlivened by the reliable Ricci Chan; Paco, with Prince Saruhan providing enough angst; and their American stepfather, who is endearingly acted by Steven Spohn. With siblings in different developmental stages, on the backdrop of an aging Papa Woolworth, whom the siblings’ display of affection is explored mostly verbally on screen, it would have been a desiring movie on paper.
Edsa is a massage therapist, with her eggs coming near expiration. Naturally, her story is on finding comfort in the arms of another. Nothing more, nothing less. Despairs and turmoils on her predicament and the nature of her job, and as a Filipino immigrant would have given a different dimension to the character and the film as a whole.
Boni, the smart gay sibling, naturally would have his identity be a driving point of the film either through marriage legality issues; ostracization even in a liberal country; distinct aspects of homosexual relationships; or on his career. This character, however, is placed as an inferior replica of Edsa’s general turmoils. What made him compelling though is the actor, Ricci Chan’s hold of his scenes even when these seem too convenient.
Precautions : * Those taking nitrate-based medications or poppers should not take loved that buy cheap viagra. Sometimes the inability to gain an erection is the viagra purchase uk prime symptom. This drug has been really proved to be cheapest levitra successful for treating distinct health problems. Therefore, cialis professional uk people do need to worry about this problem. Paco, the youngest of the brood, comes off as the distinct sibling, for a certain reason. Therefore, his struggle is on identity, and not the similar spice of love earlier mentioned. Things happen too quickly and roughly through illogical reasoning that would have been justified if he was in a Dumb and Dumber flick.
Just like how this review is presented, the film is poorly woven from three kinds of threads, producing a weak tapestry. The minimal struggles the family had to face looks nuanced as these are persistently scaled larger, alcking the subtlety some of the personal struggles possessed. Together with the face-value definition of family, as a group of people who share a home for a long time, these do not strike feelings thereof even in the most dramatic of moments. The manner of weaving each of these stories, through unusual but unpretty framing; overbearing and overused score; and an unispired script, further keeps the film out of whelm with the underexplored Woolworth family.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZJZwn-DqDw?controls=0&showinfo=0]
